After the Creature murders this person, he grinned, and “seemed to jeer, as with his fiendish finger he pointed” at the corpse while Victor was watching. 

This person gives a passionate defense of Justine at the trial, saying, “She had no temptation for such an action; as to the bauble on which the chief proof rests, if she had earnestly desired it, I should have willingly given it to her, so much do I esteem and value her.”

This Turkish merchant was cast into prison by the French government, and “it was judged that his religion and wealth rather than the crime alleged against him had been the cause of his condemnation.”

In Victor’s home, there is a picture of his mother above the mantle-piece.  Describe what she is doing in the picture.

This child hurled insults at the Creature such as “ugly monster” and “ogre.”  The Creature grasped his throat to silence him, and in a moment, he lay dead at the Creature’s feet.

5 Une journée Say where everyone is going to go or what they are going to do today. (6 x 2.5 pts. each = 15 pts.)   —Nous, nous adorons l’art contemporain. —Vous ______________________________________________________________________________. —Tu étudies cet après-midi? —Oui, je _____________________________________________________________________________. —Joseph et Jenny nagent ce soir. —Ils _________________________________________________________________________________. —Carole a un cours de chimie le lundi. —Elle _______________________________________________________________________________. —Le film est à 17h30. —On _______________________________________________________________________ vers 17h00. —Malik a besoin de manger quelque chose. —Il _________________________________________________________________________________.

3 Allons-y! Complete each sentence with the correct form of the verb aller. (6 x 2 pt. each = 12 pts.) 1. Carole ____________________ chercher son frère à la fac. 2.  Elles ____________________ à l’épicerie pour acheter du lait. 3. Pourquoi est-ce que tu ____________________ chez David? 4. Nous ____________________ trouver une solution. 5.  Je ____________________ à l’église le dimanche matin. 6. Vous ____________________ danser en boîte ce soir?

6 Quand… Complete each sentence with the correct expression from the list provided. Be logical!   (6 x 2 pt. each = 12 pts.) de fromage des frites du lait la limonade un thé glacé une baguette   1. Les enfants partagent ____________________________________. 2. Je prends mon café avec ____________________________________. 3. Nous ne mangeons pas _____________________________________. 4. Moi, je bois ___________________________________. 5. Thierry, tu n’aimes pas ___________________________________ ? 6. Avec mon sandwich, je vais prendre ___________________________________.

A university implements a voluntary first-year tutoring program. End-of-year analysis shows tutoring participants (participants=127) have higher GPAs than non-participants (participants = 200). The president recommends expansion across the institution. Further analysis reveals: Tutoring participants had higher high school GPAs (3.61 vs. 3.35) before college Participation was entirely voluntary; self-selection likely indicates higher motivation Tutoring participants also attended office hours (68% vs. 42%) and study groups (71% vs. 34%) more frequently First-generation students participated at lower rates (12% of tutoring participants vs. 31% of non-participants) despite identical initial college GPAs Students who participated in tutoring also had higher rates of advisor contact and academic planning discussions The most serious threat to concluding that tutoring caused the GPA difference is:

A graduate student uses an AI research tool to generate summaries of 38 journal articles for their literature review. The tool provides one-paragraph summaries stating “key findings” and “study implications.” The student incorporates these summaries into their literature review without consulting original articles. During thesis defense, a committee member questions a claim that “research shows first-generation students benefit most from peer mentoring compared to faculty mentoring.” The student cites an article via the AI summary. Checking the original article, the committee member finds: The article actually compared peer mentoring to no mentoring, not to faculty mentoring The article’s conclusion was specifically about a particular population (STEM majors at selective institutions) but the AI summary generalized broadly The article examined mentoring satisfaction, not actual student outcomes The original title was “Perceived Benefits of Peer Mentoring in STEM”—the AI summary had dropped the word “perceived” The student responds: “The AI tool is reliable for summarizing research. Reading all articles would be inefficient. This is a reasonable use of technology in research.” The fundamental problem with the student’s approach is: