Officers receive intelligence from a reliable informant but fail to corroborate it before obtaining a warrant. Under Illinois v. Gates, the warrant may still be valid if the totality of the circumstances supports probable cause.

Routine activities theory argues that that is needed for a criminal incident to happen are victims and targets.

The beginnings of Rational Choice theory can be traced back to the ideas presented in Environmental design (C. R. Jefferey) and Defensible Space (O. Newman)

Officers chase a suspect from a robbery scene into their home and follow immediately through the open door, arresting the person inside without a warrant.What justifies their entry?

During a lawful traffic stop, an officer spots a bag of white powder on the passenger seat. Without a warrant, the officer seizes it as evidence.This seizure is constitutional because of the _____________.

During a traffic stop, an officer smells marijuana and searches the entire vehicle, including locked compartments, without a warrant. Because the odor established probable cause, this search is constitutionally valid.

Which of the following developed Routine Activities.

During a traffic stop, an officer smells marijuana and searches the entire vehicle, including locked compartments, without a warrant. Because the odor established probable cause, this search is constitutionally valid.

During an arrest, officers damage property while searching a home without a warrant. They claim exigent circumstances, but body-cam footage shows no immediate threat or ongoing felony. Which standard should a court apply to evaluate their actions?

Routine Activities Theory suggests that the following elements are necessary for a crime to occur: