A 13-year-old client presents to clinic for a follow-up on a head injury, occurring 3 days ago The child initially had a headache when the injury occurred, but it resolved. The child reports a her energy level is back to normal but is experiencing headaches, which are relieved by acetaminophen, about 20 minutes after her first class of the day. The headaches recur in the afternoon when she tries to do her homework. Her mother is concerned she is falling behind in school.  Which of the following is the next best step in this client’s management?

A 3-month-old infant presents with swelling of the right upper arm without history of trauma. On exam, the infant has tenderness of the arm without erythema, has right-sided scalp swelling, and multiple small bruises on the torso. Which of the following is the best next steps in management?

Which statement about Kawasaki Disease (KD) is true?

A 12-year-old female presents to the clinic with a history of heavy menses, episodes of epistaxis twice a month, and reports to bruise easily. What is the most likely diagnosis for this patient?

A 7-year-old child presents to clinic with a chief complaint of “rash” in the child’s left axilla. The caregiver states the lesions have been present for several weeks and are non-pruritic. She has tried over the counter steroid creams with no improvement. What is the most likely etiology and treatment of these lesions?

A murmur that is described as a grade II and is best auscultated at the left lower sternal border is likely a functional murmur.

How long should a child with sickle cell anemia receive prophylactic penicillin?

A man owned a 50-acre lot. He had purchased 40 of those acres from his uncle and had acquired title to an adjacent 10-acre strip from an absent neighbor by adverse possession. The man entered into a land sale contract to convey the 50 acres to a friend. The contract included all necessary details as to the property, the parties, and the transaction, but was silent as to the nature of title that the man would convey to the friend. At the time of closing, the friend paid the purchase price and accepted the deed conveyed by the man for the 50-acre lot. Three months later, the neighbor came back to the area and brought an action in ejectment against the friend for the ten acres. The friend now sues the man. Which of the following statements most accurately describes the friend’s rights?

A landowner inherited a parcel of land, free of encumbrances, and promptly recorded his deed. The landowner took out a $100,000 mortgage on the land with a bank to pay for improvements to the property. The instrument was properly recorded. The landowner regularly made the scheduled payments on the mortgage. Subsequently, the landowner decided to further improve the property and took out another mortgage with a financing company for $50,000. The instrument was properly recorded. The landowner then sold the land to a buyer subject to both mortgages. The buyer procured another loan of $100,000 secured by a mortgage on the land from a lender. The lender knew about the bank’s mortgage, but the buyer did not inform her of the financing company’s mortgage. The lender lent the money to the buyer on the understanding that the buyer would use the money to pay off the bank’s mortgage, placing the lender in first priority. The buyer promptly paid off the bank but made no further payments to the financing company. The financing company initiated steps to foreclose on the land. The lender brings an appropriate action seeking to have her rights declared superior to those of the financing company.  The state in which the land is located has the following statute: “Any conveyance of an estate in land, other than a lease for less than one year, shall not be valid against any subsequent purchaser whose conveyance is first recorded.” If the court rules in the lender’s favor, what is the likely reason?

The owner of a collection of old anvils lent it to the local museum and hired professional movers to transport the anvils to the second floor of the museum, where they would be displayed. The movers used a rope and pulley apparatus to lift the anvils on the outside of the building to a second-story window. While one of the largest anvils was being lifted, it slipped and fell, crashing to the ground. However, the anvil was not even dented. If the owner brings a negligence action against the movers for allowing the antique anvil to fall, what can the owner recover?