No valid categorical syllogism can have two negative premises.

If an argument relies on the opinions of an expert, then it must commit a fallacy of unwarranted assumption.

According to the modern square of opposition, if “No S are P” is true, then “Some S are not P” must be false.

Which of the following is the major premise of the syllogism corresponding with this diagram?

Select the fallacy that best fits the description given: This fallacy occurs when there is a mistaken transfer of an attribute of the individual members of a class to the class itself.

Which answer best represents the informal fallacy being committed, if there is any, in the following argument? “Of course you should eat Wheaties. Wheaties is the breakfast of champions, you know.”

In the proposition “No S are P,” the subject term is distributed but the predicate term is undistributed

What is the figure of this syllogism?

What artistic movement did Manet’s loose brushwork later influence?

What was the Salon des Refusés?