The PTA is taking goniometric measurements for rotation of the cervical spine. According to the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, how much rotation would be considered normal, and where should the PTA align the moving arm?
von Willebrand factor is a:
von Willebrand factor is a:
An intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) helps to:
An intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) helps to:
In guinea pigs, short hair fur is dominant to long hair fur….
In guinea pigs, short hair fur is dominant to long hair fur. Two guinea pigs with short hair have a litter, what proportion of the offspring will have long hair? (Assume the two guinea pigs are heterozygous).
A patient has a diminished achilles tendon reflex. Which ne…
A patient has a diminished achilles tendon reflex. Which nerve would be impinged upon if the patient displays this symptom?
Which one of the following would NOT be considered a purpose…
Which one of the following would NOT be considered a purpose for the use of a vertical stander?
A patient presents to therapy complaining of increased numbn…
A patient presents to therapy complaining of increased numbness in the lateral leg and the dorsum of the foot with weakness in the extensor hallucis longus. What spinal level involvement would be indicated by these complaints?
A PTA is to begin gait training with a patient diagnosed wit…
A PTA is to begin gait training with a patient diagnosed with a CVA. The results of an MMT of the affected side include: Hip flexion 2+/5; Hip extension 3/5; Knee flexion 3+/5; Knee extension 3+/5; Ankle DF 3/5; Ankle PF 3/5. Based upon the minimum strength necessary, where will the PTA MOST LIKELY need to assist AND/OR block during gait training?
In which of the following is progression to acute leukemia L…
In which of the following is progression to acute leukemia LEAST likely?
Several African American dancers that worked as dancers at F…
Several African American dancers that worked as dancers at FantasyLand, a cabaret night club in Mississippi filed a complaint with the EEOC for race discrimination. The club employs more than 20 workers. Your investigation revealed that African American dancers at the club were subjected to discriminatory terms of employment. For example, they were limited in the number of shifts they could work. You also found those same dancers were required to dance at another night club owned by the same owner, for less pay and with less security, even though doing so could result in arrest, because they were not licensed by the county to dance at the other club. African American dancers who refused to work at the other club were “fined” or sent home by the owner. You are the EEOC investigator investigating this complaint. What federal statute has been violated, and what statutory factors must be established in order to create a prima facie case? In other words, identify the statute (by full name), the type of claim at issue within that statute (disparate treatment, impact, retaliation, etc.), and identify and explain each element of that claim that the EEOC would need to establish in order to proceed in a case against this company. Then (in a new paragraph), apply each of those elements to our case and arrive at a conclusion whether the statute was violated or not. Essay response must cite to both the Ch. 6 lecture and Ch. 6 of the textbook and must only reference the statutes and types of claims discussed in chapters 6 textbook/lecture. Lastly, if the EEOC successfully proves the violation you identified, what must the defendant show to overcome that proof (and win the case)? This last question requires case law support.* * Note: This essay requires case law support. Remember from our work in week one (learning how to create case briefs using the IRAC method) that legal decisions must be supported by law – statute, precedent, etc. Thus, you must identify a relevant case (one that has similar facts and similar issue) that was assigned for this chapter (SEE SYLLABUS) that would be binding on this case when writing your answer. Your answer must discuss the facts of the cited case, how those facts are relevant to our case, what the holding was in the cited case, then apply that holding (precedent) to our case to explain the conclusion you reach in our case. HINT: What does the binding case say a defendant must show once the plaintiff proves their case?