What must happen to the teeth on either side of the missing tooth when placing a bridge?

Although the dentist holds ultimate responsibility for HIPAA compliance, who typically carries most of the responsibility in the dental office?

In a bank robbery case, Clara is interrogated by police detectives and asserts her right to remain silent. If the police stop the interrogation immediately, when can they resume questioning her?

Able is a veteran of the Vietnam war and began smoking marijuana as a way to cope with his horrible memories of his war experience. For the last year, he has been in a drug treatment program to help him deal with his psychological problems without marijuana. Ben is an undercover officer with the state Drug Enforcement Agency posing as a recovering drug addict. He approached Able after a group therapy session and related common war experiences with Able. Weeping, Ben said to Able that he just couldn’t get the pictures of his dead colleagues out of his mind. Ben then implored Able to help him obtain some weed just one last time and suggested the alternative might be a decision to take his own life. Moved by Ben’s anguish, Able left the rehab center and obtained a baggie of marijuana from his old supplier. At the next group therapy session, Able slipped Ben the baggie of marijuana and Ben arrested him on the spot. Assume that marijuana is illegal in this jurisdiction. If Able lives in a jurisdiction which follows the majority rule on entrapment, the court will focus on:

Victor is charged with conspiracy. Victor was the target of an elaborate police investigation that took two years and involved the use of an undercover police officer named Hanson who recorded several conversations with Victor. If Victor is prosecuted in a jurisdiction which follows the subjective approach the court will focus on:

Calvin flew from Orlando to LA and approached a uniformed police officer at the airport and told the officer that he had killed someone and wanted to talk to the officer about it. Calvin was then handcuffed and informed of his Miranda rights and driven to the police station. Calvin was once again Mirandized and said that he wanted to confess to murdering a girl nine months ago “after hearing voices in his head which ordered him either to kill the girl or to commit suicide.” He then described how he went about committing the murder. In his trial for murder, does Calvin’s statement violate the Due Process clause?

Griffin was convicted of murder and appealed his case to the Calizonia Court of Appeals where he was denied relief. Griffin is an indigent appellant and seeks to appeal his case to the Calizonia Supreme Court. Griffin seeks a court order requiring the appointment of counsel for his case.  Is he likely to be successful?

Fulton is in jail prior to his trial for kidnapping, which has been delayed by two weeks. Fulton asserted his Sixth Amendment right to counsel during his initial arraignment. Unbeknownst to Fulton, his cellmate is a government informer. The government has given the cellmate instructions only to listen to for anything that Fulton might communicate with respect to the kidnapping case.  Is the government’s conduct in the case constitutionally permissible?

Walter is investigated by the police in connection with the theft of a museum painting worth $1 million. The police eventually charge Walter with the theft, and he is indicted for the offense. After the indictment, a witness comes forward who says that she was at the museum at the time of theft. The police schedule a lineup so that the witness may try to identify Walter as the perpetrator. After the line-up, the police talk with Walter again and elicit a statement from him. In which of these moments is the sixth amendment right to counsel implicated?  

Mason has been charged with the distribution of a controlled substance. He has been represented by John Low as his counsel in the case. However, after the trial begins Mason notifies the court that he seeks to have John Low replaced with another lawyer, Paul Smith, to represent him in the case. Paul Smith is an out of state lawyer who must seek permission to represent Mason pro hac vice. In the process of examining Paul Smith for admission to the state to handle the case, it is discovered that Paul Smith is the brother of the attorney assigned by the district attorney’s office to prosecute the case. The trial judge denied Mason’s request to be represented by Paul Smith.  If an appellate court were to examine the denial of Mason’s request for a different lawyer, how is it likely to rule?