Rubric get_scores() implementation (6 points) 6pts: Accura…

Rubric get_scores() implementation (6 points) 6pts: Accurately prompts for 7 scores, calculates the average after removing the lowest score, and prints the output 3pts: Some functionality is correct (e.g., prompts for scores, calculates an average) but fails to correctly drop the lowest score or format the output). 0pts: Missing or completely non-functional implementation get_title() implementation (2 points) 2pts: Correctly prompts the user for the graph title and returns it as a string 1pt: Returns a title but has minor issues (e.g., formatting or incorrect data type) 0pts: Missing or completely non-functional implementation get_list() implementation (5 points) 5pts: Prompts for integers between 1 and 10, validates input, stores valid integers in a list, and stops when Done is entered. Handles invalid input with clear error messages. 3 pts: Partial functionality (e.g., accepts integers but lacks proper input validation or fails to stop correctly when Done is entered). 0pts: Missing or completely non-functional implementation print_graph implementation (5 points) 5pts: Prints the title and a clean histogram where each list element corresponds to a row of stars. Output matches the example format. 3pts: Prints the graph with minor formatting or logic issues (e.g., incorrect number of stars or unorganized layout) 0pts: Missing or completely non-functional implementation Program compiles and runs when copied and pasted directly from student submission (2pts)

Question 2 – 8 Points  Izzy Paul was employed by Acme Distr…

Question 2 – 8 Points  Izzy Paul was employed by Acme Distribution, Inc. in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.  However, she was unhappy with her position and was looking for a different job.  She interviewed with other prospective employers over a period of 1 year.  Finally, after many interviews she received an offer for a new job at Dayco Company in California.  The offer, which was included in a letter to Izzy from Peter Smith, the Dayco executive who interviewed her, set forth only a summary of the terms and conditions of employment: compensation and job responsibilities; but it did not address many of the other normal terms, for example, starting date and fringe benefits that would be available to Izzy.  The offer also provided as follows: “If you are interested in this position, we would like to hear from you in the next month or so.”  Izzy was very excited about the opportunity with Dayco and immediately gave notice to Acme that she was quitting.  She also entered into a lease for an apartment in California and found a sublet to take over her lease in Milwaukee.  Because her salary with Dayco would increase substantially, she also signed a contract to purchase a new expensive car with a delivery date of September 30.  Smith, the Dayco executive, learned through a mutual friend that Izzy was intending to accept the Dayco offer of employment and that she was already planning her move to California.  Unfortunately, in the meantime, another more qualified applicant interviewed for the job at Dayco.  Smith decided to revoke the offer made to Izzy and hire the other person.  He sent Izzy a letter withdrawing the offer of employment included in the September 1 correspondence.  Of course Izzy was devastated by the news and believes that Dayco is liable to her under the circumstances based on a claim of promissory estoppel.  REQUIRED (8 Points).    Identify in separate numbered or lettered paragraphs the elements that Izzy must establish in order to succeed in her claim and put forth the best arguments she can make for each of those elements.