Match the following artworks, authors, or brands with their corresponding descriptions.

9.Stefanie is represented by Jamie Lawyer in her divorce against Robert.  Stefanie asks Jamie how the divorce will impact the $1,000,000 in bonds that she received from her Bat Mitzvah.  The information regarding Stefanie’s Bat Mitzvah bonds is protected under which of the following:  I. Attorney-Client Privilege  II. Duty To Maintain Client Confidences  III. Attorney Work Product

6.  Two years ago, an attorney represented his client in a sale of the client’s property.  Unbeknownst to the attorney, the client made some fraudulent statements to the buyer about the value of some mineral deposits on the property.  The buyer recently discovered the fraud and is now in the attorney’s office threatening to immediately file a civil fraud suit against both the client and the attorney.  The buyer accuses the attorney of engineering the fraud and helping his client carry it out.  The only way that the attorney can convince the buyer that he had no part in the fraud is to tell the buyer a fact that the client disclosed to him while the attorney was working on the property transaction.  May the attorney disclose the fact without the consent of the client?

9.Stefanie is represented by Jamie Lawyer in her divorce against Robert.  Stefanie asks Jamie how the divorce will impact the $1,000,000 in bonds that she received from her Bat Mitzvah.  The information regarding Stefanie’s Bat Mitzvah bonds is protected under which of the following:  I. Attorney-Client Privilege  II. Duty To Maintain Client Confidences  III. Attorney Work Product

7.  Criminal defense lawyer Larry agreed to represent defendant Dan at Dan’s trial for arson.  Larry and Dan orally agreed on the following attorney fee arrangement. If Dan is acquitted, the fee would be $25,000. If Dan were convicted of any lesser included offense, the fee would be $5,000. If Dan is convicted of arson, the fee would be $500. Larry further agreed to advance all litigation expenses, subject to Dan’s promise to repay Larry whatever the outcome of the case. Which of the following statements is/are correct?  I, Larry is subject to discipline for not putting the fee agreement in writing. II. It was proper for Larry to agree to advance the litigation expenses. III. Larry is subject to discipline for charging a contingent fee. IV. It was proper for Larry to require Dan to repay the advanced litigation expenses whatever the outcome of the case.

26.  Attorney calls Opposing Counsel on the phone to discuss settlement.  It quickly becomes clear that Opposing Counsel has no idea about the controlling precedent in this area of law, knowledge of which without question would be necessary for arguments in favor of Opposing Counsel’s client.  Attorney tries to press Opposing Counsel to settle on terms beneficial to Attorney’s client because Attorney knows that they have a court hearing before a judge tomorrow to discuss the matter. Attorney is unable to force a settlement that night. The next day, Attorney and Opposing Counsel appear in court and it becomes clear that the judge is not tracking the controlling precedent either.  Attorney decides to not say anything and the judge is able to talk Attorney and Opposing Counsel into a settlement.Which of the following correctly states the attorney’s professional responsibility?

6.  Two years ago, an attorney represented his client in a sale of the client’s property.  Unbeknownst to the attorney, the client made some fraudulent statements to the buyer about the value of some mineral deposits on the property.  The buyer recently discovered the fraud and is now in the attorney’s office threatening to immediately file a civil fraud suit against both the client and the attorney.  The buyer accuses the attorney of engineering the fraud and helping his client carry it out.  The only way that the attorney can convince the buyer that he had no part in the fraud is to tell the buyer a fact that the client disclosed to him while the attorney was working on the property transaction.  May the attorney disclose the fact without the consent of the client?

2. Bob is fired from his job as a security guard at the Mall of the United States.  He brings a suit for wrongful termination and sexual harassment against his supervisor, Kim, and the Mall of the United States.  Attorney represents the Mall of the United States in several of its real estate transactions.  Is it proper for Attorney to represent the Mall of the United States and Kim? 

7.  Criminal defense lawyer Larry agreed to represent defendant Dan at Dan’s trial for arson.  Larry and Dan orally agreed on the following attorney fee arrangement. If Dan is acquitted, the fee would be $25,000. If Dan were convicted of any lesser included offense, the fee would be $5,000. If Dan is convicted of arson, the fee would be $500. Larry further agreed to advance all litigation expenses, subject to Dan’s promise to repay Larry whatever the outcome of the case. Which of the following statements is/are correct?  I, Larry is subject to discipline for not putting the fee agreement in writing. II. It was proper for Larry to agree to advance the litigation expenses. III. Larry is subject to discipline for charging a contingent fee. IV. It was proper for Larry to require Dan to repay the advanced litigation expenses whatever the outcome of the case.

17. Inventor Ivan and marketing genius Gene want to form a new corporation to market Ivan’s amazing new design for motion picture projectors. They want to hire attorney Arnold to help them to do the necessary legal work and to help them find venture capital. Because they have almost no hard cash at present, they have asked Arnold to do this work for them in exchange for 4% of the capital stock of the new corporation. The remaining 96% will be divided equally between Ivan and Gene and their respective families. May Arnold agree to their proposal?