Which of the following is a moral statement?

Michael Sandel prompted Harvard students to think about particular cases and then asked them to reflect on the moral principles that provided the basis for the students’ judgments about those particular cases.

Cultural relativism claims that there is a single, universal set of moral norms that apply to all human beings throughout world history.

According to the article by Clifton Perry, lithium carbonate has been successful in helping some incompetent manic patients become capable of self-governance.

According to the moral principles described in one of your Modules, the principle of autonomy acknowledges a person’s freedom over his actions or physical body.

It is simply a fact that different societies have different moral codes that are applied to their members.

For Kant, one way to judge the morality of one’s act is to consider whether or not you would be willing to universalize the moral principle entailed by that act.

One criticism of cultural relativism (with regard to morality) is the problem of infallibility.

According to utilitarianism, the right thing to do is always a matter of the will of the majority.

Cultural relativism works best in big, pluralistic societies (such as America).