Similar to Florida v. Royer, the information received by the Houston Police Department Officer assigned to the Houston International Airport in Eisenhauer v. State was given by a reliable confidential informant.

An officer may seize any evidence he observes under the “plain view” doctrine or the “plain touch” doctrine.

Probable cause is the justification required to make an arrest?

A____________ is a mere patdown of the outer clothing or container to which a detained person may have immediate access.

The landmark case Mapp v. Ohio is significant because:

Any additional evidence obtained as a result of illegal acts is also known as:

“Inadequate police training may serve as the basis for municipal liability under Section 1983, but only if the failure to train amounts to ________________ to the right of persons with whom the police come into contact.”

Which of the following is not an indicator that serves as a building block of probable cause?

“Under the ____________ doctrine, the item seized is limited to what is in the officer’s sight. By contrast, items known or observed through the use of the officer’s other senses(smell, hearing, touching, and tasting) fall under the _____________ doctrine.”

“In Illinois v. Rodriguez, the Court held that searches in which the person giving consent has __________ authority are valid.”