Put the following argument in standard form. Then, identify…

Put the following argument in standard form. Then, identify the logical form of the argument as you’ve represented it (it can be accurately represented as one of the forms studied in this unit) .  The first thing that must occur to anyone studying moral subjectivism seriously is that the view allows the possibility that an action can be both right and not right, or wrong and not wrong, etc. This possibility exists because, as we have seen, the subjectivist claims that the moral character of an action is determined by individual subjective states; and these states can vary from person to person, even when directed toward the same action on the same occasion. Hence one and the same action can evidently be determined to have—simultaneously—radically different moral characters. … subjectivism … does generate such contradictory conclusions, the position is certainly untenable.

Put the following argument in standard form. Then, identify…

Put the following argument in standard form. Then, identify the logical form of the argument as you’ve represented it .  “Whether our argument concerns public affairs or some other subject we must know some, if not all, of the facts about the subject on which we are to speak and argue. Otherwise, we can have no materials out of which to construct arguments.”