¶ G, line 67. “At one point Liverpool finally said “I want an attorney,” and yet the questioning continued.”The continuing of questioning violated Liverpool’s rights under which amendment to the U.S. Constitution?

¶ K, lines 85-86. Sure enough, one day the Torte Bomber machine malfunctioned, injuring Nadiya severely and damaging the building. Assume the Torte Bomber machine malfunctioned because a protective shield was not part of the machine, and while the machine was in operation, a piece of the machine broke off where a protective shield should have been, causing the accident and  injuring Nadiya. KitchenButler could be liable for the product malfunction, and subsequent injury, because of:

¶ C, lines 28-30. That fired bullet went into the air, hit a drone that was flying above, crashed onto a car traveling along a nearby road, causing that car to veer in the roadway, hitting a pedestrian who was walking on the sidewalk, injuring that pedestrian.Which famous case, discussed in class, provides precedent for Fielding’s strongest defense?

Why does Fielding have a defense to a claim brought by the injured pedestrian?

If a government entity entices persons to commit crimes by suggesting and inducing criminal acts to take place, the criminal defendant may be able to assert the defense of:

¶ A, line 14. In response Fielding punched Liverpool in the face and knocked a tooth out.Fielding could be charged with the crime of:

In the case of Alton Logan and the death of off-duty corrections officer Lloyd Wickliffe at a Chicago McDonald’s, discussed in class, the persons faced with the ethical dilemma were:

¶ G, line 64. “This is just another bad act by you, so we could retry you for that as an attempted murder.”This statement by the police is false under which amendment to the U.S. Constitution?

¶ C, lines 31-36. Another driver, Walter Wayward, was driving drunk after drinking cherry vodka shots at PruBerrys. Wayward was easily distracted by all the activity, and Wayward crashed his vehicle into the old Manias Manor building that was being prepared for demolition. (See Exhibit 4.) Because there was no fencing around that building, once Wayward hit the building, bricks easily fell upon Wayward’s car causing much more damage than if Wayward had hit a “regular building.” Because of the extensive damage to Wayward’s car, Wayward decides to sue the owner of Manias Manor and the demolition crew. Under “new” negligence law, even though Wayward had some fault in incident, the result of Wayward’s suit would likely be:

In the case of Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants, which is true?