What is a key factor that complicates the definition of ‘legal’ in interpreting?

What is an essential quality for a monitor interpreter when identifying errors?

According to the document, what is a benefit of having a monitor interpreter present?

What is one of the main reasons for society’s skepticism towards professions, as noted in the document?

What must monitor interpreters be prepared to do when they identify an error?

What is the primary focus of Stone and Mirus’s discussions in ‘Deaf Wisdom for Deaf Access’?

What is a characteristic of the language ideologies held by deaf communities, as discussed in the text?

What is the primary goal of monitoring in legal interpreting?

What is the role of credentialing bodies like RID in legal interpreting?

What is a vital skill that a monitor interpreter must possess to effectively analyze and address errors during legal proceedings?