Douglas Metzgar was convicted of violating a city ordinance…

Douglas Metzgar was convicted of violating a city ordinance that prohibits any person from committing any “indecent, immodest, or filthy” act in the presence of any person. Mr. Metzgar was convicted after someone, standing in the parking lot of Mr. Metzgar’s apartment complex, observed Mr. Metzgar standing naked in the front window.  Which of the following is the best Constitutional argument for Mr. Metzgar?

Helen Ulvinen, was convicted of 1st degree murder, as an acc…

Helen Ulvinen, was convicted of 1st degree murder, as an accomplice, for her role in her son’s plan to kill his wife.  Helen was living with her son and daughter-in-law when her son choked his wife to death for refusing to have sex with him one night.  After she was dead, the defendant responded to her son’s request to act as a lookout while he dismembered his wife’s body in the bathroom.  Defendant then cleaned up the “mess” while her son dumped the body.  The defendant also agreed to corroborate her son’s story to the police that her daughter-in-law left after a fight.  What is the most accurate statement about Helen’s potential criminal liability?

Helen Ulvinen, was convicted of 1st degree murder, as an acc…

Helen Ulvinen, was convicted of 1st degree murder, as an accomplice, for her role in her son’s plan to kill his wife.  Helen was living with her son and daughter-in-law when her son choked his wife to death for refusing to have sex with him one night.  After she was dead, the defendant responded to her son’s request to act as a lookout while he dismembered his wife’s body in the bathroom.  Defendant then cleaned up the “mess” while her son dumped the body.  The defendant also agreed to corroborate her son’s story to the police that her daughter-in-law left after a fight.  What is the most accurate statement about Helen’s potential criminal liability?