Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the jwt-auth domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/forge/wikicram.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wck domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/forge/wikicram.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121 (04.04 MC)”Election pollsters sample only a minuscule portio… | Wiki CramSkip to main navigationSkip to main contentSkip to footer
(04.04 MC)”Election pollsters sample only a minuscule portio…
(04.04 MC)”Election pollsters sample only a minuscule portion of the electorate, not uncommonly something on the order of a couple of thousand people out of the more than two hundred million Americans who are eligible to vote. The promise of this work is that the sample is exquisitely representative. But the lower the response rate the harder and more expensive it becomes to realize that promise, which requires…calling many more people….Pollster.com’s Mark Blumenthal has recalled how, in the nineteen-eighties, when the response rate at the firm where he was working had fallen to about sixty percent, people in his office said, “What will happen when it’s only twenty? We won’t be able to be in business!” A typical response rate is now in the single digits.”—From Stefaan Verhulst in GovLab Digest, 2015Which polling error is highlighted in this passage?
(04.04 MC)”Election pollsters sample only a minuscule portio…
Questions
(04.04 MC)"Electiоn pоllsters sаmple оnly а minuscule portion of the electorаte, not uncommonly something on the order of a couple of thousand people out of the more than two hundred million Americans who are eligible to vote. The promise of this work is that the sample is exquisitely representative. But the lower the response rate the harder and more expensive it becomes to realize that promise, which requires...calling many more people....Pollster.com's Mark Blumenthal has recalled how, in the nineteen-eighties, when the response rate at the firm where he was working had fallen to about sixty percent, people in his office said, "What will happen when it's only twenty? We won't be able to be in business!" A typical response rate is now in the single digits."—From Stefaan Verhulst in GovLab Digest, 2015Which polling error is highlighted in this passage?
(02.01, 02.06 HC)After the 2010 census, twо cоngressiоnаl districts in North Cаrolinа were redrawn to reflect population changes. District 1 was redrawn to include more Black voters so that it would be a "majority-minority" district and represent the interests of Black voters in the area. The Voting Rights Act allowed for this in certain circumstances. District 12 was redrawn using the same rationale into a strange snaking pattern to connect groups of African Americans into one district. The plan was challenged in the federal courts as racial gerrymandering.In Cooper v. Harris (2017), the Supreme Court decided the state's new districts violated the Constitution and were examples of racial gerrymandering. Justice Elena Kagan said in the majority opinion, "The Constitution entrusts states with the job of designing congressional districts. But it also imposes one critical constraint on the exercise of that power: racial classifications of voters are subject to strict scrutiny."Respond to all parts of the question. In your response, use substantive examples where appropriate. Identify a constitutional clause that is common to both Shaw v. Reno (1993) and Cooper v. Harris (2017). Explain how the facts in Shaw v. Reno and Cooper v. Harris resulted in similar holdings. Explain how the decision in Cooper v. Harris could affect the process of redistricting for congressional representation in other states.