16. In Gonzales v. Raich (2005), the Court held that Cong…
16. In Gonzales v. Raich (2005), the Court held that Congress could rely on its power under the Commerce Clause to regulate the at-home cultivation and use of marijuana because: A. The marijuana was being grown and used for medical purposes under California’s Compassionate Use ActB. Congress was relying on its commerce power in conjunction with its power to spend to promote the general welfareC. Congress was regulating the at-home cultivation and use of marijuana as part of a broader regulatory scheme that was valid under the commerce power D. Congress was regulating the at-home cultivation and use of marijuana after the States, including California, had demonstrably failed to do so 17. In Printz v. United States (1997), the Court invalidated the Brady Act, a federal law which required state law enforcement officers to perform background checks on handgun purchasers before the federal government’s database for doing so came online. Which principle or doctrine describes this line of reasoning? A. Non-commandeering B. Non-delegation doctrineC. The state action doctrineD. Equal protection 18. If Missouri passed a law mandating that in-state businesses could ship fruitcake directly to customers in Missouri, but out-of-state businesses could not, this would violate the: A. Equal Protection ClauseB. Taxing and Spending ClauseC. Dormant Commerce ClauseD. Supremacy Clause 19. In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the Court held that the laws of Georgia did not apply on Cherokee land in Georgia because the Cherokee tribe was a sovereign nation. In _____________, the Court cut back on this ruling, finding that States could prosecute certain crimes on Native American lands. A. Muller v. Oregon (1908)B. McGirt v. Oklahoma (2020)C. Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta (2022)D. All of the above