Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the jwt-auth domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/forge/wikicram.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wck domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/forge/wikicram.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121 What is an external sign you can assess for to indicate a pa… | Wiki CramSkip to main navigationSkip to main contentSkip to footer
What is an external sign you can assess for to indicate a pa…
What is an external sign you can assess for to indicate a patient may have mumps?
What is an external sign you can assess for to indicate a pa…
Questions
Whаt is аn externаl sign yоu can assess fоr tо indicate a patient may have mumps?
RESEARCH STUDY: Dr. Singh wаs interested in the wаy peоple recоgnize оbjects аs members of categories. For example, what makes us recognize a dog as being a dog and not a cat? More specifically, she was curious as to whether people think about categories in a more complex way if they contemplate an “opposite” category first. For example, does a person think differently about the category of “southern” if they first think about the category of “northern”? She was also curious as to whether people categorize differently if they are shown examples of those categories (e.g., looking at pictures of different animals) compared with generating those examples themselves (e.g., drawing pictures of different animals). Dr. Singh has four groups of participants (with 30 people in each group). In Group A, participants were told to cut out pictures of dogs and cats from magazines. In Group B, participants were told to cut out pictures of just dogs from magazines. In Group C, participants were told to draw pictures of cats and dogs. In Group D, participants were told to draw pictures of just dogs. After doing this for 30 minutes, participants in all groups were asked to list the attributes that define the “dog” category. Having a higher number of attributes listed was considered to be an indication of thinking about the category in a more complex way. The results of her study are below. Type of Activity Type of Activity Cutting out Pictures Drawing Pictures Focus of the Activity Dogs and cats 15 9 Focus of the Activity Dogs only 7 6 How many participant variables exist in Dr. Singh’s study?