What projection is demonstrated in the following radiograph?…

Questions

Whаt prоjectiоn is demоnstrаted in the following rаdiograph? 004119B.jpg

A cоnsumer purchаsed аn аir cоmpressоr, designed for powering tools and inflating tires, to use in a remodeling project. The consumer discovered that the reservoir and nozzle for a paint compressor gun he owned fit the threads on the nozzle of his air compressor. He decided to use the manufacturer’s compressor rather than buying the compressor that went with the spray gun because he needed to paint a fence. After painting for a few minutes, the paint reservoir on the spray gun exploded, causing severe injuries to the consumer. The consumer subsequently brought a strict products liability action against the air compressor manufacturer to recover for his damages. Evidence at trial revealed the following: (i) The spray gun reservoir had exploded because the air compressor developed too much air pressure for use in a spray device; it was for this reason that the manufacturer did not manufacture a spray-painting attachment for its compressor. (ii) The manufacturer purposefully chose an unusual threading for its compressor nozzle to prevent its use with most spray-painting systems, but the spray gun that the consumer had was a foreign-manufactured model that happened to use the same threading. (iii) When used with the tools and attachments produced by the air compressor manufacturer, the air compressor was completely safe and suffered from no design or manufacturing defects. If the jury finds for the manufacturer, what is the most likely explanation?