Draw a Venn Diagram to determine if the following is valid o…

Questions

Drаw а Venn Diаgram tо determine if the fоllоwing is valid or invalid.  "Everyone who shops here has a credit card.  This person does not have a credit card.  Therefore, this person does not shop here." Make sure to label your circles, place one or two x's on your Venn Diagram, and state whether the argument is valid or invalid.   On your own paper, show all your work to justify your answer.  Leave the box below blank.  

On Christmаs Dаy, 2024, Myrоn’s sоn Briаn and his fiancée Oriоn become engaged and announce they plan to marry on Easter Sunday, April 20, 2025, while Brian is on leave from the Army. Myron enthusiastically offers to host both the wedding and reception at his home. To create a beautiful setting for the ceremony and guests, Myron decides to build a new white wooden back porch off the rear of his house. On January 1, 2025, Myron speaks by phone with Chris the Contractor, a local builder who had previously completed several successful projects for Myron. During the call, Myron explains that “time is absolutely of the essence”, and the porch must be fully constructed and painted no later than March 31, 2025, to allow for April wedding preparations. Chris agrees to build the porch for $25,000, including labor and materials, and says he needs a $5,000 deposit immediately to secure materials. Nothing is put into writing. Trusting their past dealings, Myron immediately pays the deposit. Despite repeated calls and texts, Chris does not begin work until March 1, explaining vaguely that he was waiting for “warmer weather.” Over the next several weeks, he works intermittently and with little communication. By March 31, only about 60% of the porch has been built. Chris leaves his tools at the site but becomes non-communicative and unresponsive to calls or texts. No one hears from him again for several weeks. Panicked, and with the wedding just weeks away, Myron contacts every contractor he can find. Only Pete the Contractor is available on short notice. Pete agrees to finish the job but says that because of the tight timeline, his fee will be higher. Myron agrees and pays $35,000. Pete works efficiently and finishes the porch by April 15, just in time for the wedding decorations to be put up. The wedding takes place successfully on April 20. On May 1, Chris finally contacts Myron. He apologizes and says he got “overwhelmed with other jobs” and thought “a couple days’ delay wouldn’t be a big deal.” He asks to retrieve his tools and says he would like to be paid an additional $10,000 for the 60% of work he completed, which, together with the $5,000 deposit, he believes fairly compensates him for the labor and materials he invested. Analyze all the claims that Myron and Chris could raise against each other and any remedies available to each of them.

Jоe аnd Jоy, аn engаged cоuple preparing for their upcoming wedding, decide to purchase personalized gifts for their wedding party. While browsing online, they come across a vendor called Snappy Devices, LLC, which advertises a product called the “Photo Backup Stick”—a USB flash drive that connects to computers, tablets, and smartphones to locate, transfer, and store photo files automatically. The ad emphasizes ease of use, compatibility with most devices, and “the perfect way to preserve cherished memories.” The website clearly lists the unit price at $20 per stick and includes an online order form containing pre-written contract terms. Customers are required to complete the order form, electronically sign at the bottom, and submit payment via credit card. The order form includes a clause, in bold, near the end of the agreement: “Buyer agrees to waive any and all rights to bring or participate in a class action lawsuit against Snappy Devices, LLC. All disputes must be resolved individually through binding arbitration.” There is no language anywhere in the agreement that disclaims warranties, limits remedies, or describes the product’s capabilities in technical detail. Joe and Joy submit an order for 30 Photo Backup Sticks to be given to their bridesmaids and groomsmen as part of the wedding gift bags. They pay $600 using a credit card and receive an emailed confirmation. Two weeks later, one week before their wedding, they receive a small package containing only 2 sticks, with no explanation for the short shipment. They attempt to call Snappy's customer service line multiple times, but receive only recorded messages and no follow-up. Because they do not have time to resolve the issue before the wedding, they decide to keep the 2 sticks for themselves and proceed without the others. After the wedding, Joe and Joy contact the vendor again requesting a refund for the 28 undelivered sticks, but receive no response. Later, Joe and Joy use the 2 devices to back up their wedding photos, but encounter a critical software malfunction. The devices freeze mid-transfer, and they permanently lose over 100 of their high-resolution wedding images. After some online research, they discover that hundreds of other customers have had the same problem with the devices, and several of them are now in discussions with a law firm about organizing a class action lawsuit against SnapStor Devices. Joe and Joy review the original order form and notice, for the first time, the class action waiver. They also note the absence of any mention of warranties—either express or disclaimers of implied warranties. Joe and Joy retain you as their lawyer. What potential claims could Joe and Joy assert against Snappy Devices, LLC?