Pаrt IV: Feedbаck . (Be hоnest pleаse, my feelings dоn't get hurt). These are оptional and not counted, but help me tweak the class. What is the most important lesson you've learned from studying the US Government? Do you have a favorite topic in US Government? Least favorite topic? What do you still want to know about civics/US Gov? If you could change anything about the course, what would it be and why? How can Mr. Dewitz improve the classroom experience? Did the textbook for this course cover everything adequately? Should I have provided more direct links to lectures or done podcasts/presentations for students to follow? Finally, please help me improve my class by filling out this optional and anonymous survey. Identity collection is blocked and I will not know who is answering (I will review responses some time after Sept 6, if you don't submit this it's fine): https://forms.gle/YBaSLzAyAyyWuEALALinks to an external site.
Pаrt III.Shоrt оpiniоn: Pleаse аnswer the following in one to two paragraphs that demonstrate a grasp of knowledge from the course. (Linking to historic/landmark cases in your text will score higher)In the context of the U.S. legal system, the principle of stare decisis plays a crucial role in maintaining consistency and predictability in judicial decisions. However, societal values and legal interpretations can evolve over time. Considering this, should the Supreme Court adhere strictly to precedent, or is there a compelling argument for the periodic re-evaluation of landmark decisions in light of new legal, social, and technological contexts? Discuss the implications of both approaches on the legal system. Hint: Maybe talk about the styles justices might use to approach this issue...