Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the jwt-auth domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/forge/wikicram.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wck domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/forge/wikicram.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121 (02.05 MC)The statutes whose constitutionality is involved i… | Wiki CramSkip to main navigationSkip to main contentSkip to footer
(02.05 MC)The statutes whose constitutionality is involved i…
(02.05 MC)The statutes whose constitutionality is involved in this appeal are 53–32 and 54–196 of the General Statutes of Connecticut….The former provides:Any person who uses any drug, medicinal article or instrument for the purpose of preventing conception shall be fined not less than fifty dollars or imprisoned not less than sixty days nor more than one year or be both fined and imprisoned.This law, however, operates directly on an intimate relation of husband and wife and their physician’s role in one aspect of that relation…he First Amendment has a penumbra where privacy is protected from governmental intrusion….The present case, then, concerns a relationship lying within the zone of privacy created by several fundamental constitutional guarantees. And it concerns a law which, in forbidding the use of contraceptives, rather than regulating their manufacture or sale, seeks to achieve its goals by means having a maximum destructive impact upon that relationship. Such a law cannot stand in light of the familiar principle, so often applied by this Court, that a governmental purpose to control or prevent activities constitutionally subject to state regulation may not be achieved by means which sweep unnecessarily broadly and thereby invade the area of protected freedoms.—From Supreme Court Opinion in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)Which Marbury v. Madison quote established the principle exercised in Griswold?
(02.05 MC)The statutes whose constitutionality is involved i…
Questions
(02.05 MC)The stаtutes whоse cоnstitutiоnаlity is involved in this аppeal are 53–32 and 54–196 of the General Statutes of Connecticut....The former provides:Any person who uses any drug, medicinal article or instrument for the purpose of preventing conception shall be fined not less than fifty dollars or imprisoned not less than sixty days nor more than one year or be both fined and imprisoned.This law, however, operates directly on an intimate relation of husband and wife and their physician's role in one aspect of that relation...[t]he First Amendment has a penumbra where privacy is protected from governmental intrusion....The present case, then, concerns a relationship lying within the zone of privacy created by several fundamental constitutional guarantees. And it concerns a law which, in forbidding the use of contraceptives, rather than regulating their manufacture or sale, seeks to achieve its goals by means having a maximum destructive impact upon that relationship. Such a law cannot stand in light of the familiar principle, so often applied by this Court, that a governmental purpose to control or prevent activities constitutionally subject to state regulation may not be achieved by means which sweep unnecessarily broadly and thereby invade the area of protected freedoms.—From Supreme Court Opinion in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)Which Marbury v. Madison quote established the principle exercised in Griswold?
(02.03, 02.05, 02.07 HC)In 2021, President Jоe Biden chоse Dr. Miguel Cаrdоnа аs Secretary of Education. Dr. Cardona previously served as the Connecticut commissioner of education and aimed to address the academic setbacks caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Dr. Cardona faced partisan challenges during his confirmation process. Republican senators expressed concerns about his dedication to certain educational policies, such as his stance on Critical Race Theory (CRT) and reopening schools during the pandemic. Some Republicans argued that his positions on these issues could lead to excessive federal intervention in local education matters. Democrats praised his background and focus on equity for all students.Ultimately, Dr. Cardona received confirmation with bipartisan support, as 64 senators voted in favor of him and 33 voted against. Several Republicans acknowledged his qualifications and went against party lines to support his confirmation. However, the confirmation process revealed the divisive nature of education policy in the U.S.Respond to all parts of the question. In your response, use substantive examples where appropriate. Referencing the scenario, describe the steps required to confirm a Cabinet member. Explain how the debate between Republican and Democratic senators in the scenario reflects a tension between the power held by the Executive and Legislative branches of government. Explain how this scenario might impact bipartisan relations in government in the future.