A study from the Danish Twin Registry (from Statistics: A gu…
A study from the Danish Twin Registry (from Statistics: A guide to the Unknown) looked at the rates of concordance of certain somatic diseases between identical and non-identical twins, where our example focuses on epilepsy. What this means is that if one twin had epilepsy, it was recorded whether or not the other twin also had it. The rate of concordance for identical twins was 54% and for non-identical 24%. Below is the bootstrap dotplot from the sample. Choose the correct interpretation of the given confidence interval . Does there appear to be a difference in the rates between the two populations?