20 minutesYоu will write а brief essаy using оne оf the prompts below. The ideаl answer would have the following qualities: Make a specific interpretive claim about the text Develop this over-arching interpretive claim through a series of smaller arguments, which would likely be structured as individual paragraphs with interpretive topic sentences. In each paragraph, introduce and contextualize specific evidence from the book that can be used to support your claim. Provide analysis and logical arguments that show how the evidence supports the claim. Anticipate and address obvious counter-arguments or alternative interpretations. Connect the interpretive claim, evidence, and arguments to a broader view of how the book represents or fictionalizes life in a world with a changing climate. Prompt 1: Responsibility Some of the challenges associated with responding to climate change are determining who is responsible and clarifying what kind of responsibility they have. How does the book explore the tension between the kinds of "everyday responsibility" that people have when they are living normal lives and the kinds of responsibility that the "climate criminals" or "destroying classes" have? What perspective does the book offer on this tension? Prompt 2: Conflict Today, there are many competing ideas about what, if anything, might lead to people to undertake meaningful climate responses. In the book, what is the role of conflict in the start and development of the "Great Transition"? How does this affect the different ways that Larch and Kristina see the present day of the story? What perspective does the book offer on this conflict? Prompt 3: History One of the challenges associated with climate change involves time: many of the impacts of present-day greenhouse gas emissions will be felt in the future; just so, many of the benefits of mitigating present-day greenhouse gas emissions or doing work to adapt to the changing climate we might undertake today will be felt in the future. What perspective does the book offer on climate response as something that happens over a long period of time? Prompt 4: Ethics Today, there are figures who have taken up sabotage of fossil fuel infrastructure, like pipelines, in response to climate change. Additionally, there is some evidence that climate change has already contributed to- or intensified- political violence in some regions of the globe. In the book, different figures have very different perspectives on the ethics of the political violence that occurs in the plot. What are those perspectives and what does book suggest about these debates?