Academic Honesty Commitment I understand that maintaining ac…

Academic Honesty Commitment I understand that maintaining academic integrity is essential for my personal and academic growth.By signing this agreement, I affirm that: I will complete my own work independently unless collaboration is specifically allowed by the instructor. I will not copy, share, or use unauthorized materials, resources, code, or solutions, whether human- or AI-generated, unless explicitly permitted. I will not assist or receive assistance from others in ways that violate the rules of individual assignments, quizzes, exams, or projects. I understand that violations of this agreement may result in academic penalties, including a failing grade on the assignment or in the course, and/or disciplinary action according to university policies. I recognize that academic integrity is a responsibility I owe to myself, my classmates, my instructor, and my institution. Student Acknowledgment By signing below (Please write your name), I confirm that I have read and understood the terms of this Academic Honesty Agreement.I agree to uphold these standards throughout this course.  

Explain Kripke’s modal argument against identity theory abou…

Explain Kripke’s modal argument against identity theory about pain. Kripke rejects identity theory by showing that one can conceive of C-fiber firings without pain. But some people, including Kripke himself, have argued that some cases of conceivability can be explained d (for example, the conceivability of water that is not H2O). So, one might object that the conceivability of C-fiber firings without pain can be explained away. Explain how Kripke blocks this objection and critically evaluate his position about this issue. A full answer should: Explain the argument by explicitly stating its premises and its conclusion. Briefly explain each premise and Kripke’s reasoning behind it. Highlight the premise (or premises) that amount to showing that the conceivability of C-fiber firings without pain cannot be explained away. Explain Kripke’s reasoning in support of it and critically evaluate this reasoning.