Please fill in the blank.  ____________________ requires a court to settle the matter once and for all, by awarding a lump sum for past and future expenses.

Which of the following are examples of true impossibility?

Mauricio has agreed to perform some work for Jamison Technologies Inc. Which of the following would be more likely to indicate that Mauricio is an employee and not an independent contractor?

June, a nineteen-year-old student at SUU, took a friend out to dinner at Milt’s restaurant. They both had fake ID’s stating that they were twenty-one years old, the legal drinking age in the State of Utah. They ordered filet mignon meals worth $120 and one $500 bottle of wine, which they split evenly. When they bill came, they tried to run out of the restaurant. They were stopped, however. Is June liable for the meal?

Two individuals had a dispute over the interpretation of a term in their contract. The judge in a bench trial found that neither meaning of the term as contested by the parties was valid. In this case, the judge would most likely interpret the case in favor of:

Which of the following elements is NOT required in a negligence action?

On April 1st, Porter buys Silvester’s car for $10,000 and they agree that Porter will pay Silvester the full amount by July 1st. Porter begins making payments to Silvester, but on June 1st, Porter still owes Silvester $5,000. On June 1st, Porter sells Anne his motorcycle for $5,000. Porter and Anne agree that Anne will not pay Porter $5,000, but Anne will instead pay Silvester the $5,000 Porter still owes him. Silvester agrees to receive the $5,000 from Anne. In this scenario, who is the obligor, who is the assignee and who is the assignor?

A sales associate at Ladoo’s Convenience Store refused to allow Fry to return a back of smoked sausages. Fry became irate; he raised his fist in a motion that seemed as though he was going to punch the sales associate in the nose. At the last minute and just an inch from the associate’s face, Fry dropped his hand. Fry committed the tort of:

Julie buys a microwave at David’s yard sale. The first time she uses it, a negligently manufactured power cord catches fire, and burns her condo down. Julie sues the microwave manufacturer and David alleging that the microwave was defective – what result?

What is a good?