Which scenario would a non-cognitivist most likely suggest about moral language?

Which scenario best shows an open question, as Moore discussed?

Why does cultural relativism not simply reduce to emotivism?

Why is bridging the moral gap — deriving “ought” from “is” — a central challenge in moral philosophy?

What is the significance of Hume’s is-ought gap in moral philosophy?

Which statement best distinguishes metaethics from normative and applied ethics?

Why might one consider metaethics “academia for academia’s sake,” and what is a counterargument?

What does the debate between moral cognitivism and non-cognitivism primarily concern?

Which idea might a moral naturalist reject?

In prescriptivism, how are moral statements primarily understood?