Using the scale below, rate this assignment, compared to Homework 4, on how much it helped (or forced) you to understand the concepts covered in this module. 1 = actually made my understanding worse than the Module 4 Homework 2 = helped a little but not as much as the Module 4 Homework 3 = helped about the as the Module 4 Homework (didn’t add anything) 4 = helped a little more than the Module 4 Homework 5 = helped somewhat more than the Module 4 Homework 6 = helped a lot more than the Module 4 Homework 7 = Helped soooo much more

Which scenario would a non-cognitivist most likely suggest about moral language?

Which scenario best shows an open question, as Moore discussed?

Why does cultural relativism not simply reduce to emotivism?

Why is bridging the moral gap — deriving “ought” from “is” — a central challenge in moral philosophy?

What is the significance of Hume’s is-ought gap in moral philosophy?

Which statement best distinguishes metaethics from normative and applied ethics?

Why might one consider metaethics “academia for academia’s sake,” and what is a counterargument?

What does the debate between moral cognitivism and non-cognitivism primarily concern?

Which idea might a moral naturalist reject?