[Parental Involvement] Lexie and Fernando, both artists, dis…

Lexie and Fernando, both artists, discussed forming a partnership to paint portraits. Fernando’s parents were interested in investing in the partnership, but they wanted to avoid any liability. Fernando suggested forming a limited partnership. He told Lexie and his parents that they could do it very informally, that an oral agreement was sufficient, and that the parents would be protected from liability. However, Lexie insisted that a certificate of limited partnership be filed with the secretary of state, over Fernando’s objection that it was a waste of money. After a few months, Lexie and Fernando decided that they wanted to add a new partner, Melissa, to the partnership as a general partner. Melissa had some expertise in the portrait field but she had also had some scrapes with local law enforcement. Fernando’s parents objected strenuously to the admission of Melissa. Lexie and Fernando took the position that the parents, as limited partners, had no say in the admission of a new partner. Fernando’s father, who had an interest in painting and was concerned that the partnership was not making very much money, decided to start coming to the partnership studio to manage the business and attempt to bring it into profitability. Which statement is true regarding the issue of Fernando’s father deciding to manage the partnership?

[Health Food] Josh and Merida are partners and owners of J&M…

Josh and Merida are partners and owners of J&M Health Food Store. Carson, who is a registered dietician, works for J&M on and off as a consultant, as he is very knowledgeable about the health benefits of natural herbs. Carson travels to conventions around the country and tests new products and often relays information about the new products to J&M. At a convention last month, Carson met Monte, a vitamin producer, who stated that he was glad to meet one of J&M’s partners. Carson replied that the new Fresh product line was exactly what J&M needed and placed a significant order for J&M. When the Fresh product was delivered, J&M had closed the store for remodeling, and the product spoiled. Can Monte seek damages from Carson?

[Mortuary Blues] Jack and Bianca had a partnership running a…

Jack and Bianca had a partnership running a mortuary. Bianca died, and after her death, Jack decided to shut down the mortuary. Jack incurred some expenses in closing the business affairs of the mortuary. He sought compensation for those expenses but Gus, the executor of Bianca’s estate, objected. Gus also claimed that Jack had no rights in Bianca’s share of the partnership property and that Gus, the executor, had the right to confiscate her share of the property and sell it at auction. Jack, however, took the position that all interests of Bianca passed to Jack and that Jack owed her estate nothing. The articles of partnership did not address death. Is Jack correct that he owed Bianca’s estate nothing?

[Health Food] Josh and Merida are partners and owners of J&M…

Josh and Merida are partners and owners of J&M Health Food Store. Carson, who is a registered dietician, works for J&M on and off as a consultant, as he is very knowledgeable about the health benefits of natural herbs. Carson travels to conventions around the country and tests new products and often relays information about the new products to J&M. At a convention last month, Carson met Monte, a vitamin producer, who stated that he was glad to meet one of J&M’s partners. Carson replied that the new Fresh product line was exactly what J&M needed and placed a significant order for J&M. When the Fresh product was delivered, J&M had closed the store for remodeling, and the product spoiled. Can Monte seek damages from Carson?

[Mortuary Blues] Jack and Bianca had a partnership running a…

Jack and Bianca had a partnership running a mortuary. Bianca died, and after her death, Jack decided to shut down the mortuary. Jack incurred some expenses in closing the business affairs of the mortuary. He sought compensation for those expenses but Gus, the executor of Bianca’s estate, objected. Gus also claimed that Jack had no rights in Bianca’s share of the partnership property and that Gus, the executor, had the right to confiscate her share of the property and sell it at auction. Jack, however, took the position that all interests of Bianca passed to Jack and that Jack owed her estate nothing. The articles of partnership did not address death. Is Jack correct that he owed Bianca’s estate nothing?

[Green Trees] Keith, the president of Grow True Corporation,…

Keith, the president of Grow True Corporation, a company that provides landscaping services, wanted his corporation to purchase Grassroots Corporation, another corporation providing landscaping services. The board of Grassroots Corporation, however, did not wish to sell. The board of Grow True Corporation decided to buy any or all of Grassroots Corporation’s stock in order to gain control of Grassroots Corporation. The management of Grassroots Corporation and its board strongly objected to the attempt by Grow True Corporation to take over the company. Grow True Corporation offered to purchase stock held by Grassroots shareholders at a price substantially above the current market value of the stock. When that strategy was not wholly successful, Grow True Corporation offered to give shareholders of Grassroots Corporation stock in Grow True Corporation in return for their Grassroots Corporation stock. By offering to give shareholders in Grassroots Corporation stock in Grow True Corporation in return for shares of stock in Grassroots Corporation, Grow True Corporation made a ____.

[Grooming Grievances] Andrew, Marie, and Cruz formed a partn…

Andrew, Marie, and Cruz formed a partnership to groom dogs. Because they were good friends and anticipated making a profit sufficient to compensate all partners well, the articles of partnership did not allocate profit or losses. Marie was appointed managing partner. Unfortunately, the business did not go as well as expected and the partnership incurred some losses. Cruz claimed that he should not have to share in losses because he had groomed more dogs than anyone. Cruz also claimed that although the partnership did not reference compensation for additional duties, he was entitled to compensation because of his extensive work. Marie claimed that she should not have to share in losses because she contributed more capital than did either of the others. Andrew claimed that he should not have to cover the losses because both Marie and Cruz had been hiding the books from him. He demanded to inspect the books and also to review a listing of all partnership assets and profit statements listing distributions to partners. Marie and Cruz denied that they had been hiding the books and claimed complete innocence of any wrongdoing. Which of the following statements is correct regarding how the partnership losses would be allocated?