What question represents the second step of the Columbo method?

Koukl suggests that when someone calls you a name you:

Why is the willingness on the part of the disciples to suffer and die for their beliefs so profound, since people of other faiths willingly die for their beliefs too?

What is the difference between the logical argument from evil and the evidential argument from evil?

What does Koukl advise doing to be able to speak up quickly without “rocking the boat” when an opportunity presents itself?

Match each family of arguments for the existence of God with the best description.

What is the “burden of proof”?

Why is the “swoon theory” not a viable explanation to deny Jesus’ death?

How is the principle of embarrassment employed to support the empty tomb?

How do we know that the disciples were not lying regarding their belief in Jesus’ resurrection?