This is a bonus question, The correct answer is false. 

Statistical analyses show that in countries with a mismatch between the proportion of the ethnic group in the army and that in control of politics is

The Congress leadership was dominated by a few ethnic groups. These groups were underrepresented in the army. 

Pakistan strengthened civilian control by strengthening its intelligence capabilities and monitoring the top general. India refrained from such measures as it was seen as too risky. 

What accounts for the loss of legitimacy of the Pakistani army?

Initially, India and Pakistan were quite similar in their degree of ethnic diversity. 

How did India engage with its paramilitary forces?

The reforms of the Indian armed forces impeded their effectiveness and preparedness. Please name two examples that were mentioned in the book. 

How did West and East Pakistanis perceive of themselves?

After partition, what was the situation of Muslim officers in India?