In my lecture this week, I argue that our Doing Ethics autho…
In my lecture this week, I argue that our Doing Ethics author’s choice to include social contract theory in this week’s Chapter 5 (focusing on consequentialist moral theories) is a strange/unusual one.What reason(s) do I provide supporting my argument?What reason(s) do I provide supporting my separate argument that despite it being a strange/unusual thing to include in this chapter, it is worthwhile to learn about social contract theory?⚠️ Reminder: Submitting any part of this Learning Evaluation created in whole or part using AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, etc.) or AI-enhanced writing/translation platforms (e.g., Grammarly, QuillBot, DeepL, Google Translate, Wordtune, Microsoft Editor, etc.) is a violation of this course’s Academic Integrity policy (see Syllabus).Like other forms of plagiarism, it is considered academic misrepresentation or fraud—because you are submitting work generated by someone or something else as your own. This includes editing suggestions or rephrasings produced by AI-based writing assistants.If you’re ever unsure whether something you’re using is allowed, ask first.