Taylor argues that claims about human superiority are flawed…
Taylor argues that claims about human superiority are flawed because they are “standpoint biased.” Is this argument convincing? Why or why not? Are there any human traits that might objectively justify a different moral value/status for humans — or is Taylor right that we’re simply favoring ourselves without justification?⚠️ Reminder: Submitting any part of this Learning Evaluation created in whole or part using AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, etc.) or AI-enhanced writing/translation platforms (e.g., Grammarly, QuillBot, DeepL, Google Translate, Wordtune, Microsoft Editor, etc.) is a violation of this course’s Academic Integrity policy (see Syllabus).Like other forms of plagiarism, it is considered academic misrepresentation or fraud—because you are submitting work generated by someone or something else as your own. This includes editing suggestions or rephrasings produced by AI-based writing assistants.If you’re ever unsure whether something you’re using is allowed, ask first.