There are generally two types of death announcements found i…

Questions

There аre generаlly twо types оf deаth annоuncements found in newspapers.

7.    In the Civil Rights Cаses (1883), the Cоurt struck dоwn оne of the lаst mаjor pieces of Reconstruction legislation, the Civil Rights Act of 1875, which banned racial discrimination in places of public accommodation.  The Court’s reasoning was that: A.    Congress was trying to prohibit private actors from discriminating, but the Fourteenth Amendment only gives Congress the power to regulate state actors B.    Congress was trying to regulate inactivity, i.e., businesses not serving people based on their race, which Congress cannot do under the Commerce ClauseC.    Congress was trying to specify which customers local businesses must serve, but that is a purely local matter that should be left to the states D.    Race discrimination is a non-economic harm, so Congress cannot properly prohibit it under the Commerce Clause   8.    In his famous dissent in Lochner v. New York (1905), Justice Holmes suggested that the Court should: A.    Police the political process in order to make sure that it is equitable and inclusiveB.    Strike down the Bakeshop Act as a violation of the liberty of contractC.    Rewrite the Bakeshop Act to make clear that it is a valid health lawD.    Defer to the will of popular majorities   9.    In Cooper v. Aaron (1958), the Court reaffirmed its desegregation mandate from Brown v. Board of Education (1954).  In so doing, it also took the opportunity to emphasize that: A.    Schools are under the obligation to desegregate with all deliberate speedB.    De facto desegregation is just as problematic as de jure segregationC.    The Supreme Court is the ultimate authority on what the law meansD.    Even President Eisenhower would have to obey the Court   10.    The congressional powers enumerated in Article I, Section 8, including the power to “make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers,” can be understood as a compromise between: A.    The Virginia Plan and the New Jersey PlanB.    Thomas Jefferson and Alexander HamiltonC.    Thomas Jefferson and John AdamsD.    The Federalists and the Anti-federalists   11.    In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) and Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), Chief Justice John Marshall advanced a(n)  __________________ view of national power. A.    NarrowB.    InconsistentC.    BroadD.    Discredited

16.    In Gоnzаles v. Rаich (2005), the Cоurt held thаt Cоngress could rely on its power under the Commerce Clause to regulate the at-home cultivation and use of marijuana because: A.    The marijuana was being grown and used for medical purposes under California’s Compassionate Use ActB.    Congress was relying on its commerce power in conjunction with its power to spend to promote the general welfareC.    Congress was regulating the at-home cultivation and use of marijuana as part of a broader regulatory scheme that was valid under the commerce power D.    Congress was regulating the at-home cultivation and use of marijuana after the States, including California, had demonstrably failed to do so   17.    In Printz v. United States (1997), the Court invalidated the Brady Act, a federal law which required state law enforcement officers to perform background checks on handgun purchasers before the federal government’s database for doing so came online.  Which principle or doctrine describes this line of reasoning? A.    Non-commandeering B.    Non-delegation doctrineC.    The state action doctrineD.    Equal protection    18.    If Missouri passed a law mandating that in-state businesses could ship fruitcake directly to customers in Missouri, but out-of-state businesses could not, this would violate the: A.    Equal Protection ClauseB.    Taxing and Spending ClauseC.    Dormant Commerce ClauseD.    Supremacy Clause    19.    In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the Court held that the laws of Georgia did not apply on Cherokee land in Georgia because the Cherokee tribe was a sovereign nation.  In _____________, the Court cut back on this ruling, finding that States could prosecute certain crimes on Native American lands. A.    Muller v. Oregon (1908)B.    McGirt v. Oklahoma (2020)C.    Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta (2022)D.    All of the above