The fоllоwing fаct pаttern will аppear in several questiоns. You do not need to re-read it each time. It will be the same for each of the questions. Fact Pattern #2: The ATF is conducting a search pursuant to a warrant that allows them to seize any sawed-off shotguns they find. Sawed-off shotguns, which are about two and a half feet in length, are illegal to possess. Looking in a closet by the front door, the agents indeed find three sawed-off shotguns, but they also find a one-foot tall statue of Venus that had been stolen in a recent art heist. The agents know that a one-foot tall statue of Zeus was also stolen in the same heist, so they look inside a nearby shoebox to see if it contains the statue of Zeus. Low and behold, they find that statue too. As they continue their search of the home, the agents see three boxes of new laptops. Because they were aware that there had been a break-in at a nearby electronics store, they have a hunch that the laptops may be stolen. Because they are not sure, however, they turn over one of the boxes to check the serial number. Sure enough, the laptop was stolen. The agents then decide that they should also begin searching for laptops that might be hidden in other places. As they continue their search, the agents open a pill box. In it the agents find several grams of crack cocaine. Based upon this discovery, the agents begin searching for crack as well as laptops and sawed-off shotguns. While searching a small drawer in a bed stand, the agents find several stacks of marked bills from a recent bank robbery. The owner of the home is later charged with possession of sawed-off shotguns, art theft, burglary, possession of crack cocaine, and bank robbery. Which of these is the best answer to support the use of the stack of marked bills at trial?