Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the jwt-auth domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/forge/wikicram.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wck domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/forge/wikicram.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121 When is deception permitted in research? | Wiki CramSkip to main navigationSkip to main contentSkip to footer
20. In Ex Pаrte Merrymаn (1861), Rоger Tаney (acting as a circuit judge) ruled that President Lincоln did nоt have the power to suspend the writ of habeas corpus because: A. The Constitution provides for the suspension of the writ in Article I, which lays out Congress’s powers and dutiesB. If the President were allowed to suspend the writ, he would soon claim the power to suspend all of the lawsC. If the President were allowed to suspend the writ, he would be able to indefinitely detain people without charge or trial, gravely endangering civil libertiesD. Suspending the writ would violate the Bill of Rights 21. According to Justice Jackson’s famous separation-of-powers typology in the Steel Seizure Case (a.k.a. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952)), when the President takes measures incompatible with the express or implied will of Congress: A. His action is per se unconstitutionalB. His power is at its lowest ebb, because he can only rely on his own constitutional power, minus those powers entrusted to CongressC. His action is in a zone of twilight because he and Congress have concurrent authority and yet they disagreeD. His authority is at its maximum because he speaks as a representative of all the people, elected by all the people 22. In INS v. Chadha (1983), Justice White dissented, insisting that the majority’s decision to invalidate the legislative veto forced Congress to choose between two very problematic courses of action. What were they? A. Either to refrain from delegating to administrative agencies the authority necessary for effective governance or to abdicate its law-making function to administrative agencies altogetherB. Either to refrain from delegating to administrative agencies the authority necessary for effective governance or to take on the hopeless task of writing specialized laws to cover the entire policy landscapeC. Either to refrain from delegating to administrative agencies the authority necessary for effective governance or to delegate large swaths of policymaking authority to administrative agencies while retaining limited oversightD. Either to abdicate its law-making function to administrative agencies altogether or to delegate large swaths of policymaking authority to administrative agencies while retaining limited oversight