Widget Wоrld wаs incоrpоrаted in аnd has its principal place of business in State A. Widget World also operates its own stores in State A, State B, and State C, through which it sells its widgets to consumers, repairs faulty or broken widgets regardless of where they were purchased, and allows returns, again regardless of where the widget was purchased. Cooper, who resides in State B, visited a State B store to purchase a widget. The State B store did not have the widget he needed, and employees at the store directed him to the nearby State C store. Cooper visited Widget World’s State C store and purchased the widget. Cooper returned to his home in State B, where he was injured while using the widget. Cooper intends to file a products liability action against Widget World in the Federal District Court for State B, and Widget World timely moves to dismiss or transfer for improper venue and to dismiss for a lack of personal jurisdiction.Should the court grant the motion on either of these bases?