You are administering heparin and following the protocol bel…

Questions

Yоu аre аdministering hepаrin and fоllоwing the protocol below for a client weighing 251 lbs. The order is to administer an initial heparin IV bolus followed by a titrated IV infusion.  Round to the tenths place. HEPARIN PROTOCOL Initial bolus- 60 units/kg Initial rate – 12 units/kg/h Obtain a PTT every 6 hours, and adjust dosage and rate as follows: If a PTT is less than 35 secs:      Repeat bolus with 40 units/kg and increase the rate by 4 units/kg/h. If a PTT is 36 to 44 seconds:       If a PTT is 36 to 44 seconds:          Repeat bolus with 20 units/kg and increase the rate by 2 units/kg/h. If a PTT is 45 to 75 seconds:       Continue current rate. If a PTT is 76 to 90 seconds:       Decrease rate by 2 units/kg/h. If a PTT is greater than 90 secs: Hold the heparin for 1 hour and decrease rate by 3 units/kg/h. Available (for bolus)  - heparin 1,000 units/mLAvailable (for infusion) -  heparin 25,000 units in 250 mL D5W What rate will the nurse set the pump at for the initial titrated heparin IV infusion?

I wоuld аgree with St. Augustine thаt "аn unjust law is nо law at all." . . . Hоw does one determine whether a law is just or unjust? . . . An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas [a thirteenth-century Christian theologian]: An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust. All segregation statutes are unjust because segregation distorts the soul and changes the personality. It gives the segregator a false sense of superiority and the segregated a false sense of inferiority. Segregation, to use the terminology of the Jewish philosopher Martin Buber, substitutes an "I-it" relationship for an "I-thou" relationship and ends relegating persons to the status of things. Hence segregation is not only politically, economically, and sociologically unsound, it is morally wrong and sinful. Paul Tillich has said that sin is separation. Is not segregation and existential expression of man's tragic separation, his awful estrangement, his terrible sinfulness? Thus it is that I can urge men to obey the 1954 decision of the Supreme Court, for it is morally right, and I can urge them to disobey segregation ordinances, for they are morally wrong.Documentation information for this excerpt: Title of essay: "Letter from Birmingham Jail"Author: Martin Luther King, Jr.The essay is published in the following text: The Norton Reader, 10th ed.Publisher: NortonDate of publication: 2000Editors: Linda H. Peterson, John C. Brereton, and Joan E. HartmanPage number: 891According to MLA guidelines, which of the following reflects a correct understanding of both how to quote from a passage, for the first time in a paper, and how to document the source in the text of a paper with proper punctuation placement?