A journalist named Maya has been investigating corruption wi…
A journalist named Maya has been investigating corruption within a major city government. A whistleblower inside the mayor’s office, who insists on remaining anonymous, provides her with documents proving that millions of dollars intended for public housing have been redirected to shell companies linked to the mayor’s campaign donors. Maya publishes a story based on the leaked documents, sparking a public outcry and a formal investigation. Soon after, a grand jury is convened, and Maya is subpoenaed to reveal the identity of her source. The whistleblower contacts Maya in a panic, fearing job loss, harassment, or worse. They beg her not to reveal their identity. Meanwhile, Maya’s editor and legal counsel warn her that refusing to testify could result in contempt of court charges and jail time. Maya must now decide: Protect the source, honoring the journalistic principle of confidentiality but potentially facing jail time. Reveal the source, avoiding legal consequences but betraying the trust that made the story possible—and potentially discouraging future whistleblowers.What should Maya do, in your opinion, and why? Give a detailed answer.