An ETL job ingests database log lines of the form:ORDER=1234…
An ETL job ingests database log lines of the form:ORDER=1234 ITEM=5678 PRICE=99.99It uses a regular expression like:ORDER=(\d+)\s+ITEM=(\d+)\s+PRICE=(+)and then maps capture groups by *position* to columns:group 1 → order_id, group 2 → item_id, group 3 → price.The regex engine also supports named capture groups, e.g.,ORDER=(?\d+) … ITEM=(?\d+) … PRICE=(?+)but the ETL currently relies only on positional groups (1, 2, 3).Over time, the logging format may evolve (e.g., new fields are added or order changes, current field names may get changed).Which statement about using regex-based parsing in this ETL pipeline is NOT correct?